B.C. homeowner ramping up battle to remove shocking racist language from land title

Warning: Some language in this story may be offensive to some readers. Discretion is advised. 

A West Vancouver homeowner is ramping up the battle to remove shocking racist language from an old legal document.

Michele Tung lives in the British Properties. It is an area of West Vancouver known for its multi-million-dollar views and exclusive homes.

The area was marketed to white settlers in the 1930s and land titles at the time specifically excluded certain people from buying or even living in these homes.

Tung had known about the covenant on her home but was stunned to learn that even though it has not been enforced for almost 50 years, she had to submit it in order to get a permit to do some renovations.

The covenant states: “That the Grantee shall not sell, assign, or transfer the said lands or any interest therein to any person or persons of the African or Asiatic race or of African or Asiatic descent.”

“I was flabbergasted,” Tung said.

The issue was first brought up two years ago and Tung wants to know why the city still hasn’t taken action to delete the language.

“One clause said ‘no pigs, no cattle,’ so no farm animals,” she said.

“But then below that, it said ‘no one of Asiatic or African descent was able to reside on the property unless they were a servant.’”

View image in full screen

Tung said when they moved into the house in 2008, they already requested the city remove the language of ‘no Jews and no Chinese’ from their property title.

“So then to be asked, by the city, after a motion was passed two-and-a-half years ago that they were in the process of removing all of this language in our municipality, to see this and then be asked by a staff member to submit this information was very shocking to me,” she said.

“But in addition to that, I was very angry because my children, I am ethnically Chinese, my husband is Belgian, and so basically, my children are mixed, so basically this was a situation where people, a company, a government, that was shaming them for being who they are.”

The covenant is not legally enforceable as of 1978 but the amendment did not empower the Land Title and Survey Authority to proactively search for, identify, and delete discriminatory language from covenants that had been registered prior to 1978, or to delete occurrences of discriminatory language found.